Thursday, 23 August 2012

Great review of my new book on Copyright for writers

She got it: it's meant to be anecdotal and informal and plain English and also journalistic, in the 'accessible' sense. It's not for lawyers: it's for writers, editors and publishers.


Learned Publishing, 25: 235–239 
Book Reviews 
Book Reviews 
LEARNED PUBLISHING VOL. 25 NO. 3 JULY 2012 

Copyright Law for Writers, Editors 
and Publishers 

Gillian Davies in association with 
Ian Bloom 
London, A. & C. Black Publishers, 
2011, 128pp. 
ISBN: 978-1408128145, £14.99 (pbk) 

This book follows on from Gillian 
Davies’s Copyright Law for Artists, Photographers 
and Designers, and is very different 
from normal academic textbooks 
on copyright or publishing and media 
law, being somewhat personal and anecdotal. 
It is an engaging case study in 
itself, right down to Davies being the 
joint copyright owner for the cover illustration, 
presumably because she is also 
an artist as well as a writer with a law 
degree and a law editor. 

As an example of book-as-case-study, 
in the chapter ‘Quoting/ Extracts’ 
Davies takes us through her tribulations 
in getting permission to use lyrics from a 
song by the band Pink. The lyrics are 
quoted in the book just so that Davies 
can take us through the ins and outs of 
obtaining permission. I really enjoyed 
that: it brings the whole point and process 
of getting permission to life in a way 
that a theoretical dissection of the law 
could not. Davies’s blunt comment ‘the 
point about copyright law is that you are 
supposed to ask for permission to use 
something that someone else created 
first’ is a really important back-to-basics 
point and is very pertinent to our 
Internet culture where free to view is 
wrongly assumed to be free to use. I am 
quite tempted to ask permission to use 
that quote in the signature line of my 
work emails! 

Davies is rightly at pains to point out 
that she is not a lawyer (and not the 
Gillian Davies who is a barrister and 
academic writer on copyright), and this 
perhaps explains the pragmatic approach 
alluded to above. A nuanced academic 
immersed in the philosophy of intellectual 
property might not want to put 
things so boldly and might not be in a 
position to know how the quirks of copyright 
play out on the ground in everyday 
life (as opposed to the seminal court 
cases). The audience for this book is in 
its title – and what to do in practice 
(never mind the legal subtleties) is what 
writers, editors and publishers need to 
know. This book delivers this outcome 
in a way that I have not found before. 
The chapter by her co-author, Ian 
Bloom (a solicitor), ‘Going to Law’ 
(which should in his words be called 
‘Not Going to Law’) is essential reading 
for anyone who feels they have a principle 
to prove. The advice and commercial 
reality is that principles are 
dangerous things to get attached to, and 
that is it is far better to mediate and 
compromise. 

As its title suggests, the book provides 
a practical overview of the most pertinent 
aspects of literary copyright covering 
the ideas/expression dichotomy, 
substantiality and fair dealing. It also 
covers moral rights and the law of privacy 
and defamation. Very practical 
aspects are covered: looking at additional 
ways authors might make money 
from their copyright (e.g. signing up to 
the Authors Licensing and Collecting 
Society) as well as advice about royalties, 
income tax and VAT, none of which 
sound thrilling but are nevertheless 
interesting if they affect you. 

For all the practicality of the work it is 
not without its interesting forays into 
case law. It often surprises me that in 
books intended for laypeople, writers 
leave out the cases – the very things that 
breathe life to the theory of the law. 
What is there not to understand about a 
case skilfully summarised and explained? 
With literary/artistic works we have the 
advantage that the players are often 
colourful characters and we actually 
know about some of subject matter. 
Luckily Davies seems to agree and gives 
us the Da Vinci Code, the Spear of Destiny, 
the Alan Clark Diaries as well as 
what seems to be a personal favourite of 
hers, Confetti Records v Warner, a case 
from the music industry about moral 
rights which involved bewigged appeal 
judges deciphering rap lyrics. For the law 
fans the case citations are given too. 
I do not have many criticisms of this 
book. 

The most disappointing part is the 
chapter on plagiarism, although it was 
instructive to learn that plagiarism is a 
distinct common law cause of action. 
Bloom admits some cynicism in his comment: 
‘the difference between plagiarism 
and research is this: plagiarism involves 
copying someone else’s work; research 
involves reading several different 
sources and copying bits out of each of 
them’. This definition seems to predominate 
in trade publishing. However, there 
are less cynical definitions that this 
chapter could have gone into. In my 
experience of academic publishing, academic 
editors and publishers take a more 
principled view. Academia bases its existence 
on the integrity of the academic 
record which brings knowledge forward. 
Within this context other people’s 
research must be acknowledged. Of 
course, it is always a difficult area – at 
what point does a theory become so 
developed as to move away from its original 
creator? 

The book’s authors might 
have be advised to consult the Committee 
on Publication Ethics (COPE) about 
plagiarism in the academic world for a 
more thoughtful chapter on this topic. 
Bloom talks of plagiarism again in the 
chapter ‘The Death of Copyright?’ and I 
am not sure that I entirely hold with the 
bleak view of this chapter in an academic 
context. There is deliberate plagiarism 
which falls under the heading of 

both plagiarism (of any definition) and 

copyright infringement; however, more 
forgivably, some academic authors get 
confused where the academic definition 
of plagiarism does not correspond to 
copyright law. For example so long as 
academics credit sources they are not 
always so concerned about obtaining 
permission and the moral respect for 
other people’s intellectual creations and 
ideas remains. And this is, I suppose, 
where Copyright Law for Writers Editors 
and Publishers is useful: I would recommend 
it to writers and publishing professionals, 
and particularly to publishing 
students, graduate and undergraduate 
alike. 
Anji CLARKE 
Sage 
Anjali.Clarke@sagepub.co.uk 
© Anji Clarke 2012 
doi:10.1087/20120312 


No comments:

Post a Comment